Lean & Co.


Lean means slim. And lean management means designing a company in such a way that everything that is unnecessary is avoided. Everything that wastes resources, that drives up costs, that paralyzes and slows us down. In short, to find the answer to the following question: Is it possible to achieve the same or a better result with less effort, costs and frictional losses, without – and this is best of all – without losing quality?

Is that possible? Or is it not possible?


Get better, be faster, make more profits by making things leaner? You don't think that works? It works very well. What you need are the tools of lean management.


Imagine a two-lane highway being reduced to just one lane. The reasons for this are not important. This can be an accident as well as a construction site. The fact is, however, that now someone always has to stay standing. This results in traffic jams, delays and, of course, frustration for everyone involved.

Baker or carpenter?



Shall we take another look at our bakery? Or would you prefer a carpentry shop, a service company, a branch of industry? No matter what type of business, it will only work well and be successful if there are no bottlenecks in the company's processes.

But what is a bottleneck?


This is a resource that is only available to a limited extent.

    A person, a machine, a factor of time, financial resources

The performance of your company depends on this. If even one of these resources doesn’t “work,” you’ll be at a serious competitive disadvantage. And you can't compensate for that if you don't work on the bottlenecks immediately.

Our example is now a carpentry shop.



The company has invested in a new, ultra-modern and, above all, almost unappetizingly expensive machine for cutting wood. Everything should now become faster, better and more lucrative.

The fact is, all of the company's orders have to go through this, every cut in wood has to go through this machine.


Nobody wants that


And now we’re drawing a “worst-case scenario” on the wall that no company wants, but that could certainly be possible in almost every company.

    In view of the new machine, the sale of our busy carpentry shop with almost 30 employees very optimistically acquired and negotiated five large orders at the same time, in the firm assumption that the machine would do the job. There is only one such machine for the time being. There is also only one employee, who can “reasonably” operate the machine. This employee received a short training course. He can set process data that is necessary for different requirements. However, the machine “can” do much more. But there is no time left to learn all of this.

And suddenly everything changed

    When accepting the new projects, sales communicated very optimistic time estimates for delivery. According to the company's process data, the processes on the machine are running out of time. But no one expected this and took into account that changing the setting parameters on the machine is so time-consuming. This is mainly due to the required precision. A minimal incorrect entry and “the board is cut”.

All projects haywire

    The entrepreneur's goal is to complete the top project first. It's also about prestige. But it's already clear: the next project is also important. For economic reasons alone. And the third project has to work. Because this is a long-term customer.

The fourth project is not quite as big, but it only works if the delivery date is strictly adhered to, otherwise everything at the customer's end comes to a standstill. Completion was only possible with a guaranteed deadline.

What had to come comes

    The fifth project? Let's keep quiet about it because it's also important because the seller gave his word. See how it all works together? Prestige, profitability, customer orientation, contractual loyalty, emotions. All wonderful values of a company. But also an explosive mixture when the bottleneck arises, when two lanes suddenly become one lane. Now comes what had to come. It takes far too long for the parameters on the new machine to be changed. The software is extremely complex and equally complicated. The employee is under enormous pressure, which he of course cannot withstand, because there has been movement in the company for a long time. An unpleasant movement, however. Sales seems stressed because the top project is still not ready for delivery. Management is getting nervous because they realize this , what will happen now. It's called “Murphy's Law.” Do you know that? In simple terms: “Things could have gone wrong. And it went wrong.”



The pressure in the boiler increases

    Due to the increasing pressure, the pressure is increasing in almost all areas of medium-sized companies. This also increases the susceptibility to errors. And the vast majority of these errors only become visible in downstream processes. The machine now has to be reset. Everything at the beginning. Set everything up again. Further loss of time, loss of material, loss of image

And it's still not the climax


    Backlogs arise that will soon no longer be able to be caught up. And with so many new priorities, no one can see what is important. And the worst-case scenario has not yet reached its peak. To make matters worse, the employee at the machine is now also getting sick However, his replacement only has a short training period and therefore does not meet the necessary requirements. The possibility of ever having to use this employee was not really considered. This leads to further delays, even more annoyance and, in the meantime, poor communication within the company.


The frightening silence

    It's only a matter of time before this gets out. All subsequent processes are affected by the traffic jam at the cutting machine. Assembly cannot be carried out in the hall. Delivery is at a standstill. The assembly employees cannot attend to customers start setting up the projects. The time pressure, the loss of image and, above all, the economic damage increases and takes on unmanageable proportions.


Loss of time, loss of materials, lack of economic success

    Internal and external communication has long been going haywire. Also because the interfaces of the processes are not clearly defined. Orders are initially canceled. At least one project can be completed. However, due to delays and loss of materials, it did not achieve the expected economic success.

We better end this scenario at this point before we all get in a bad mood.

Something has certainly become clear:


There are such bottlenecks. And once your nerves are frayed, even the commitment and overtime no longer help.

 

That was a comparatively simple example. And it is very likely that the solution would have been possible. In our case:

    Better communication at all levels - that would have resulted in a more careful, forward-looking approach when accepting projects... Comprehensive competence of the employees - then the problems with the machine would never have occurred... Equivalent personnel replacement - then an employee's illness would not have been so extreme Weight dropped...

Lean means slim.

And slim means, above all, avoiding everything unnecessary.


Unnecessary waste

In this context, some so-called types of waste have been defined in company processes.

 

  • corrective actions

    Example: A hole in a board element was incorrectly placed. Due to inadequate and early quality control, the error was noticed too late. The entire process must be repeated. This costs time and means loss of material.

  • Overproduction

    Example: Five cladding elements were ordered for a project, but eight of them were produced. Motto: we could use it somewhere else. Without knowing if and when. The remaining three elements must be stored. Storage space costs money.

  • Unnecessary movement

    Example: The valuable software instructions for the cutting machine are not available in the production hall, but must be obtained from the management in the main building whenever required.

  • Complex processes

    Example: Sales needs a little information from the production department for the delivery and assembly departments. Production delivers the information to sales. Sales forwards to delivery. The delivery is forwarded to assembly. A small but clear intervention in this process shortens the process by at least two stations and thus significantly streamlines the process by avoiding unnecessary steps.

  • Stocks

    Example: Excessively large and unnecessary inventories not only cost money because of the large storage areas, but also because of the complex management of the warehouse and previously resources due to overproduction.

  • Unused potential of employees

    Example: Now let's come back one last time to our carpentry shop, which has now been so badly damaged. Nobody in the company knew that the newly hired employee in the assembly team at his previous employer had successfully completed an extensive course in operating this new cutting machine and had already worked practically in operating the software.

  • waiting period

    Waiting times cause disruptions in the process. This uses up capacity and leads to additional costs.

“Bottlenecks eat up processes before breakfast.”

Hannes Alton, founder

Get in touch
Share by: