Lean means slim. And lean management means designing a company in such a way that everything that is unnecessary is avoided. Everything that wastes resources, that drives up costs, that paralyzes and slows us down. In short, to find the answer to the following question: Is it possible to achieve the same or a better result with less effort, costs and frictional losses, without – and this is best of all – without losing quality?
Get better, be faster, make more profits by making things leaner? You don't think that works? It works very well. What you need are the tools of lean management.
Imagine a two-lane highway being reduced to just one lane. The reasons for this are not important. This can be an accident as well as a construction site. The fact is, however, that now someone always has to stay standing. This results in traffic jams, delays and, of course, frustration for everyone involved.
Shall we take another look at our bakery? Or would you prefer a carpentry shop, a service company, a branch of industry? No matter what type of business, it will only work well and be successful if there are no bottlenecks in the company's processes.
This is a resource that is only available to a limited extent.
The performance of your company depends on this. If even one of these resources doesn’t “work,” you’ll be at a serious competitive disadvantage. And you can't compensate for that if you don't work on the bottlenecks immediately.
The company has invested in a new, ultra-modern and, above all, almost unappetizingly expensive machine for cutting wood. Everything should now become faster, better and more lucrative.
The fact is, all of the company's orders have to go through this, every cut in wood has to go through this machine.
And now we’re drawing a “worst-case scenario” on the wall that no company wants, but that could certainly be possible in almost every company.
The fourth project is not quite as big, but it only works if the delivery date is strictly adhered to, otherwise everything at the customer's end comes to a standstill. Completion was only possible with a guaranteed deadline.
We better end this scenario at this point before we all get in a bad mood.
There are such bottlenecks. And once your nerves are frayed, even the commitment and overtime no longer help.
That was a comparatively simple example. And it is very likely that the solution would have been possible. In our case:
In this context, some so-called types of waste have been defined in company processes.
Example: A hole in a board element was incorrectly placed. Due to inadequate and early quality control, the error was noticed too late. The entire process must be repeated. This costs time and means loss of material.
Example: Five cladding elements were ordered for a project, but eight of them were produced. Motto: we could use it somewhere else. Without knowing if and when. The remaining three elements must be stored. Storage space costs money.
Example: The valuable software instructions for the cutting machine are not available in the production hall, but must be obtained from the management in the main building whenever required.
Example: Sales needs a little information from the production department for the delivery and assembly departments. Production delivers the information to sales. Sales forwards to delivery. The delivery is forwarded to assembly. A small but clear intervention in this process shortens the process by at least two stations and thus significantly streamlines the process by avoiding unnecessary steps.
Example: Excessively large and unnecessary inventories not only cost money because of the large storage areas, but also because of the complex management of the warehouse and previously resources due to overproduction.
Example: Now let's come back one last time to our carpentry shop, which has now been so badly damaged. Nobody in the company knew that the newly hired employee in the assembly team at his previous employer had successfully completed an extensive course in operating this new cutting machine and had already worked practically in operating the software.
Waiting times cause disruptions in the process. This uses up capacity and leads to additional costs.